Flamily v. City of Orlando (14 So. 3d 254, 2009)

PER CURIAM.

We review this case on remand from the Florida Supreme Court. See Sanders v. City of Orlando, 997 So.2d 1089 (Fla.2008). Claimant raises one issue on appeal, while the City raises four cross-appeal issues.

Claimant argues that the JCC erred in ruling the City was not estopped from denying compensability. We conclude that the JCC did not err in rejecting Claimant’s estoppel argument. Further, we affirm the issues raised on cross-appeal without discussion.

The JCC’s final order is AFFIRMED.

HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.