Anderson v. State (16 So. 3d 1020, 2009)

PER CURIAM.

Danny Anderson appeals the order finding that he violated his community control. As there is competent, substantial evidence demonstrating Anderson’s community control violation, we affirm. However, we x’emand the matter for entry of an amended revocation order specifying the conditions of community control that were violated. See Patt v. State, 876 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.