Watkins v. State (163 So. 3d 608, 2015)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SHEPHERD, C.J.,

concurring specially.

I concur in affirming the trial court’s revocation of Watkins’ probation and the sentences imposed. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation, I would remand for entry of an order setting forth the reasons for revoking probation, in accordance with the trial court’s oral pronouncements. See Thomas v. State, No. 3D13-1794, 2015 WL 1040617 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Brown v. State, 127 So.3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).