Isla v. State (185 So. 3d 695, 2016)

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Golden v. State, 84 So.3d 396, 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“Assuming arguendo that the trial court properly allowed Golden’s counsel- to adopt'the pro se motion, the effective- date of an adopted pro se motion is the date it is adopted- and not the initial date the unauthorized pleading was filed.”).

LAWSON, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.