Freebarin v. State (23 So. 3d 170, 2009)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s revocation of his probation. We affirm the revocation of probation; however, remand is required for entry of an order specifying the conditions which Appellant was determined to have violated. See Jones v. State, 638 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.