Williams v. State, Commission on Ethics (23 So. 3d 235, 2009)

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rosenzweig v. Dep’t. of Transp., 979 So.2d 1050, 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding that a claim of error, even in the administrative context, cannot be raised for the first time on appeal); Arza v. Fla. Elections Convm’n, 907 So.2d 604, 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding that appellant could not challenge agency decision on appeal, where no challenge had been made below).

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.