T.K.O. v. State (231 So. 3d 583, 2017)

PER CURIAM.

T.K.O. appeals the disposition order finding that he committed the delinquént acts of trespass in an unoccupied conveyance and resisting' an officer without violence. The State has appropriately conceded that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the trespass offense, as the evidence failed to establish that T.K.O. knew or should have known that the ear from which he was seen fleeing was stolen. See E.A.B. v. State, 851 So.2d 308, 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); P.W. v. State, 730 So.2d 422, 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). We therefore reverse the trial court’s finding that T.K.O. committed that delinquent act and remand for the court to amend the disposition order accordingly. The court’s order is affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.