Rodriguez v. State (232 So. 3d 483, 2017)

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Rodriguez appeals from the judgment and sentence entered following the revocation of probation for the 2012 count of manufacturing marijuana, for which the trial court originally accepted his plea and withheld adjudication while he served the probationary sentence. We affirm the revocation and the judgment and sentence that were entered without further comment, but because the order of revocation does not specify the conditions Rodriguez admitted violating, we remand for the entry of an order specifying those conditions. See Huggins v. State, 216 So.3d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.