Falco v. State (44 So. 3d 198, 2010)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of her rule 3.800(c) motion for reduction and/or mitigation of sentence. Despite the language in the order of dismissal informing appellant that she had thirty days to appeal, there is no right to appeal from the denial of a rule 3.800(c) motion. See Reeves v. State, 23 So.3d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Howard v. State, 914 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.