Harris v. State (49 So. 3d 865, 2010)

PER CURIAM.

We summarily affirm the circuit court’s denial of Harris’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence and motion for rehearing, which the court construed to be a rule 3.850 motion. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. We caution Harris that the filing of successive or otherwise procedurally barred claims will result in proceedings to determine appropriate sanctions. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.