Citations

Full opinion text

HIGGINS, J.

Appellee sued Terrazas & White and garnished the appellant. The latter answered, admitting an indebtedness to the principal defendants upon certain “concentration claims,” but sought to offset against the same the sum of $536.58 which it was claimed had been previously improperly refunded by it to Terrazas & White. Upon trial without a jury the asserted offset was disallowed, and the garnishee appeals. The refund in question had been made upon a concentration claim of Terrazas & White upon 305 bales of cotton.

A cotton mill is located at El Paso, Tex. A regulation of the Interstate Commerce Commission reads:

“Concentration For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes