Smith v. State (18 S.W.2d 675, 1929)

CHRISTIAN, J.

Tbis case is before us on a writ of error. Review of a final judgment forfeiting an appearance bond is sought.

For a discussion of tbe questions presented by tbe record herein, see opinion No. 12313, Louise Magless et al. v. State of Texas, 18 S.W.(2d) 669, opinion rendered March 6, 1929, and not yet [officially]' reported. Practically the same questions being involved as were presented in tbe case referred to, tbe judgment here must also be affirmed. Tbe judgment of tbe court below is reformed, so as to bear no interest.

As reformed, tbe judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM. Tbe foregoing opinion of tbe Commission of Appeals has been examined by tbe judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by tbe court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

MORROW, P. J.

Tbe facts present the same legal questions as those discussed in tbe opinion on motion for rehearing in tbe case of Jack Smith et al. v. State (No. 12321) 18 S.W.(2d) 672, and are controlled by tbe same legal principles. Upon the reason and authorities there set forth, tbe motion for rehearing is overruled.